On 1/25/07, Brian Candler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:58:03PM +0100, Alan Marco IsiMan wrote: > ... > Mirrored pairs of disks will be better, but still nowhere near what the > Netapp achieves (although maybe sufficient for your purposes, given that the > NetApp is very expensive). BTW I would avoid ReiserFS: I have had very bad > experience with data loss. Essentially there are no fsck-like tools for data > recovery with ReiserFS - a limitation that the author freely admits. Once > it's corrupted, everything is lost. > ... > Regards, > > Brian.
Sorry for this kinda off-topic but a doubt just arose here :) What do you mean by "there are no fsck-like tools for data recovery with ReiserFS", Brian? What reiserfsck is for you? Really just a doubt, ok? :) Thank you in advance, -- Eduardo Bacchi Kienetz LPI Certified - Level 2 http://www.noticiaslinux.com.br/eduardo/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Courier-imap mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-imap
