Roberto C. Sanchez wrote, on 10. feb 2007 16:17: >> Surely all of the above only applies to Suse? None of it is appropriate >> to Red Hat/Fedora rpms, generated from the standard Courier IMAP specs. >> >> Nor do the remarks on respecting possible mounting of /usr ro fit in >> with the standard RH/FC habit of putting documentation in >> /usr/share/doc, without remounting /usr twice during an rpm >> install/update (which doesn't happen). For interest's sake, I'll post to >> the rpm ML asking for comments on this.
Thanks, Roberto, for the answer. > Except that documentation is not machine specific nor is it architecture > specific. Thus, /usr/share is the correct place for it according to the > FHS. Now, I don't know how RH/FC handle a ro mounted /usr. But I do > have some Debian servers with this configuration. I was able to > configure dpkg to remount /usr as rw prior to package installation or > removal and then remount again as ro afterwards. > > This makes sense as there are few packages (or probably none at all) > that don't install anything into /usr. Indeed; I got an answer from the rpm packager authorities "de" Jeff and James, telling me that there was no provision in rpm for doing file system remounts and it would be up to the site admin himself to provision for remounts during installs. >> Quite another thing is, that Courier makes no attempt to conform to >> Linux/SysV file hierarchy (see Sam's remark on waiting for a major new >> version for such to occur). If Red Hat/Fedora were ever (God forbid) to >> support and package Courier products, I'd expect files to be put all >> over the place where I wouldn't know their locations and a major >> patching operation would have to be carried out at rpm build time to >> cope with this. Personally I wouldn't mind if Courier did start adhering >> to LFH, even though it would break existing installations - but this is >> by no means a request. >> > I'm sure that the Debian package has some significant patching going on > to make it FHS/Debian compliant. Of course, that work is already done. > Though I am sure that it would make the life of the Debian Courier > package maintainer much easier if the upstream configuration was already > compliant. I concur ;) Best, --Tonni -- Tony Earnshaw Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Courier-imap mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-imap
