ons 2002-04-17 klockan 22.22 skrev Jesse Keating:
> > me too. We use only the IMAP part.
>
> maintaining a separate list is not a valid idea. There are more people who use
> the entire set than don't.
I seriously doubt this.
Personally, I've been using Courier IMAP for a couple of years (Linux
packages/BSD ports) and only found out it _was_ a complete suite when I
started looking for this mailing list and the tarball when trying it on
Solaris.
> It is MUCH more logical to have one list, that
> serves all, then to split if off, and make people subscribe to 3 or 4 strains
> of courier lists.
I fail to see the logic in a large part of the user base getting lots of
mail they're not interrested in.
> Get a client that handles threaded email, and you can just ignore threads that
> don't have anything to do with IMAP. Pretty simple.
Yes, and we all contribute to a 75% bandwidth waste (rough estimate
after my short time on this list) to anyone only interrested in the IMAP
part.
And I would still have to manually figure out which threads were about
IMAP and which weren't.
So, yes - I would also prefer an IMAP-specific list.
/
Leif
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
