>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roland
>Schneider
>Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 3:05 PM
>To: courier-users
>Subject: RE: [courier-users] Opinions wanted: mail gateway?
>
>
>--Jerry Amundson wrote on 24.05.2002 13:49 -0500:
>
>> Perhaps I should clarify:
>> I am going to remain on Courier, but the question is whether or not I
>> continue to relay through my outside mail hub.
>>
>> The other question is with just ports 25, 993 (imapssl), and 995
>(pop3ssl)
>> allowed through the firewall to the mail server, is my inside network
>> exposed enough to cause concern?
>
>A firewall wich allows _any_ connection from untrusted
>sources into the internal net does not deserve that name.
Well put. I started leaning towards keeping the current configuration after
my last post....
>Public services should be placed in the dmz, and not even
>the dmz should be allowed to create connections into the
>internal net.
Except for the mail hub smtp'ing to/from the internal mail server, right?
>One single server in the dmz will be enough, dont forget
>to setup some intrusion-detection and monitor the box.
>
>Roland
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
