On 07 8 2003 at 3:50 pm -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >> Under normal conditions this has been working fine. However, recently I >> have tried to combine multiple instructions, on two lines, as one might >> do in a .courier-default file. I've discovered that this fails to work, >> apparently because something is parsing the line-separators incorrectly. > >Correct. It's not implemented.
Okay, glad I know now. Thanks. (Any plans for it?) Something else which bit me tonight, actually as a result of backing out of a test scenario for what we just discussed. I realised that a .courier-default containing a single blank line causes the delivery to simply vanish. I suppose it is being interpreted as a blank delivery instruction, hence, discard the mail without notice. Is that by design? If not, it seems like a dangerous oversight. If so, I can't imagine why it is desirable. I discovered this was the case after scratching my head for awhile about why no mail was coming in to a particular account. (I probably caused this to exist by doing an 'echo >.courier-default' as opposed to 'rm .courier-default; touch .courier-default'.) Nonetheless, a blank (I now realise that means EMPTY!) .courier-default is required for [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarding to occur per the delivery instruction in the mysql table. Nuisance. -ben -- Ben Kennedy, chief magician zygoat creative technical services 613-228-3392 | 1-866-466-4628 http://www.zygoat.ca ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
