Jon Nelson wrote:

On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Julian Mehnle wrote:


Malcolm Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Which leads to the inevitable observation that there are no prizes for
conformance to the RFC, but there are for getting the job done.  The
job of a mail transfer agent is to transfer mail.  Not pass a
conformance test based on a specific interpretation of an RFC...

Not conforming to the RFC might not get you a prize, but it definitely has a price you'll have to pay some day or another. Widely accepting non-compliance will inevitably make non-compliance... well... widely acceptable. So we tend to lose standards compliance, ultimately harming interoperability.


Mr. Weir is absolutely right.

No, he's not.


I challenge you to show me a software product that is 100% RFC compliant
*and* is usable without major caveats.  Offhand, I can't think of any.

Anything relating to FTP.


jerry



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

Reply via email to