> -----Original Message----- > From: dick hoogendijk > Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:44 AM
[ Snip ] > My 2 ct: I agree fully to the compliance rules of courier. Why? 'cause I > see everyday waht non-compiance does on the web (www). And I hate it. If > I would want a MTA that was more non-compliant then I simply would > install one, wouldn't I. The choice for courier is based on its > strictness (among other things..) That's an argument for selective enforcement, not slavish enforcement. By the way, it's ironic that Courier *doesn't* accept the [EMAIL PROTECTED] notation, with all this frothing about the importance of standards! And I'd remind you that in *this* case, there *is* an interpretation that *is* in the RFC. So this is not "non-compliance" vs "compliance", this is "aggressive interpretation" vs "relaxed interpretation". Plus, I repeat my question, this time to you: What might an MX->CNAME mean if not "follow CNAME to A"? > dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE Malc. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
