Provided that they will follow through on their promise, and they don't do something stupid, like using a “trusted authority” certificate model, this is going to be the final solution. “freemail” is just a temporary stop-gap measure.
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/12/05/spam.yahoo.reut/
Acknowledging that my opinion isn't worth much, this seems stupid. As described, the solution would require all of the work that SPF does (http://spf.pobox.com/), plus additional computation. What's the additional check get you?
Am I missing something, or is this going to be a stupid standard that gets used only because it's backed by enough money?
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&op=click _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
