I'm not sure - the way I read it it sounded more like a verification of the sender - not the recipient... similar to spf I guess it will require REAL registered domains to host the txt records containing the keys (guessing here). But instead of validating a sender to a recipient (which screws up CC and BCC as well as forwarding) it just validates a sender...
Would be nice if they'd throw up a working document so people could throw some collective brainpower at it. m/ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gordon Messmer Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 10:19 AM To: Courier Users Subject: Re: [courier-users] Re: freemail list and questions about yahoo... Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Gordon Messmer writes: > >> Acknowledging that my opinion isn't worth much, this seems stupid. As >> described, the solution would require all of the work that SPF does >> (http://spf.pobox.com/), plus additional computation. What's the >> additional check get you? > > > Forwarding will now work. Malcolm tried to impress upon me the same thing. The description on cnn.com is not very technical. Who has the private keys? How does forwarding work? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
