Lorenzo Perone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > And I never told/meant implementors are sloppy or whatever.
I never implied that you said that. *I* said it, and I mean it. But that's irrelevant here. What's relevant is that Phillip Hutchings indirectly gave to *you* the advice[1] to just rely on the "From:" header as opposed to the "From:" in combination with the "Sender:" header (as I suggested). And I replied to *him* (not to you) that giving such advice was bad IMO. > [...] > Yes, the Sender: would be at least a hint, if courier just > added this header... there must be a way to do it it in a > maildrop filter.. (or I didn't find the right conf var/file yet)... Add the "Sender:" header *from what*? Out of thin air? Or from a validated envelope sender? > Does anyone know under which variable, or place, the envelope address is > available in maildrop filters? > It is not automatically inserted in the mail headers - at least not in > my courier installation/conf... It's in the RPLINE or SENDER environment variables. You can also filter your messages through `preline` before calling maildrop, which adds various headers such as the "Return-Path:" header with the envelope sender address. In your dot-courier file (or database delivery instruction) just write: | preline maildrop [1] "People who want this sort of control are more likely to be worried about the From: header, as that's what shows to the receivers of the e-mails." ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
