On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Eduardo Roldan wrote: > On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 14:05, Chris Petersen wrote: > > > Of course, it'll be just in time for the release of this new thing that > > the SPF guys and microsoft are planning. And as far as I know, it won't > > be backwards compatible with SPF, and as much as we may dislike it, no > > microsoft endorsement means SPF as it stands now won't compete against > > the new protocol (esp. since the SPF people will be supporting this > > newer protocol). > > The article talks about compatibility between SPF and SenderID. In > resume it says that SPF dns records are compatible with SenderID. So now > we can deploy SPF without fear of remake all again.
However, it also says that the new records *can* be published in XML. That's right. XML. In DNS. Oh Goody! If anything will kill easy and widespread adoption of something it's **XML** in *DNS*. -- Ensign Walnut approaches Dr. Crusher with caution... Jon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> C and Python Code Gardener ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
