Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Justin Murdock writes:
>>> Justin Murdock writes:
>>>> I'm running the v 3.0.8 of the standalone Courier imap server.
>>>>
>> Shouldn't Courier be returning those of the "x", "e" and "t" flags that
>> are set in this case?
>>
>> "maildiracl -compute ...... user=me" returns lret,
>> but myrights returns lr. Bug?
>
>
> There are no e and t rights in ACL1.
>
> If you are using the ACL1 API, use the d flag.
>
> If you are using the ACL2 API, use the full set of flags.
 
I'm sorry, I don't understand.
 
The manual entry suggests that maildiracl uses ACL2.
 
The server lists ACL2=UNION in its capability, so I guess it uses ACL2.
 
The working draft says "A client may determine the set of rights granted to the 
logged-in user for a given mailbox by using the MYRIGHTS command."
 
Why then does "maildiracl -compute ...... user=me" return the ACL2 result 
"lret", but when I'm logged into the server as "me" 'r1 MYRIGHTS 
"#shared.user.folder"' only returns "lr"?
 
Am I missing something obvious?
 
I note they've "fixed" the "c" flag to be "k" and "x"
 
> If you're messing with maildiracl, you have to know which clients you will be 
> dealing with.
 
I though the point of having backwards compatability was that you didn't?
How do I cause the server to return ACL2 rights?
 


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

Reply via email to