At the risk of stick my foot in my mouth, it seems to me this has
strayed a bit from the original problem...
Sam, if someone else were to write an acceptable patch that updated
SQWebmail to handle larger cookies, would you be willing to accept it
into the main trunk?
best,
Jeff
On Apr 13, 2006, at 12:57 PM, Ben Kennedy wrote:
Sam Varshavchik wrote at 6:20 AM (-0400) on 4/13/06:
Fair enough. Though I was under the impression that
subdomain.domain.com can set cookies under domain.com. I just looked
It can, and it's a domain that you control, in both cases.
Really? This surprises me. By that logic, you should be able to
set a
cookie for all of .com as well. From the DNS standpoint there is no
difference between the relationships "sub.domain.com : domain.com" and
"domain.com : com". Does the HTTP cookie spec have a particular
provision for second-level domains?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
