Bowie Bailey wrote: > Aidas Kasparas wrote: > No, that won't work. If this approach worked, the pythonfilter > wouldn't be going to all that trouble. >
:-( > The problem is that Courier has already read the message into memory > before calling the filters and does not read it again after the > filtering. So if you change the message file, the changes will not > be reflected in the copy of the message that is already in memory. > What are the reasons for reading that file before filters? How about making courier understand that it has to reread filtered file by supplying "100 please reread" answer from filter (for example)? -- Aidas Kasparas IT administrator GM Consult Group, UAB _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
