[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just out of interest, does SPF break with multi-homed senders as well, or > are multiple SPF records a valid (and more importantly, commonly supported > by MTAs) configuration?
They're perfectly valid, of course. If you look at my SPF record you'll see why I've never had problems. BTW, I do reject invalid messages based on SPF: There is no point not doing that. >> SPF has been sentenced 2 years limbo after the MARID/IETF, >> so perhaps we'll talk about it again in spring 2008. IMHO, >> the day it will be an official protocol, organizations may >> be hold responsible for helping phishers by not setting up >> adequate SPF policies. That may boost its diffusion and >> hence effectiveness. > > And on that day I'll be looking into setting up a fast foot chain selling > Kentucky fried pigs' wings. ;-) That must be a typo, I assume you meant "big foot"... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
