Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote: > Alessandro Vesely wrote: > | IMHO there is no reason to discard softfail (~all) while allowing > | neutral (?all). I cannot find google in http://spf-all.com/ > > So what would your recommendation be, then? How would you modify this > settings? > > opt BOFHSPFHELO=pass,unknown,error,none,neutral > opt BOFHSPFMAILFROM=pass,unknown,error,none,neutral > opt BOFHSPFFROM=pass,unknown,error,none,neutral,mailfromok
It might be enough to add softfail to each line. However, that won't work with SPF-agnostic mailing lists, where you'll get sporadic false positives. Thus you can set opt BOFHSPFHELO=pass,unknown,error,none,neutral,softfail opt BOFHSPFMAILFROM=pass,unknown,error,none,neutral,softfail opt BOFHSPFFROM=all The last line performs the lookup but accepts the message in any case. You can then safely discard SPF-failed bounces, e.g. checking empty Return-Path with a maildrop recipe. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
