Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> That's unrealistic. the user-part in MAIL FROM has a length
>> limitation which goes against secure signatures. the other question
>> is why would this be needed (I mean, is it really worth the trouble?)...
>>
>> isn't
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (where "blahblah" is whatever you want)
>> enough? (replace '+' with whatever "extension" character you use)
>
> That was my first thought as well. Maybe if I waste half a day trying
> to decipher that document, I'll see some brilliance in that proposal,
> but, so far, I just don't get it.
>
the "primary" scheme proposed in the draft is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
where "KDDDSSSSS" is the "tag-value".
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
