mouss writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:[snip]That's unrealistic. the user-part in MAIL FROM has a length limitation which goes against secure signatures. the other question is why would this be needed (I mean, is it really worth the trouble?)...isn't [EMAIL PROTECTED] (where "blahblah" is whatever you want) enough? (replace '+' with whatever "extension" character you use)That was my first thought as well. Maybe if I waste half a day trying to decipher that document, I'll see some brilliance in that proposal, but, so far, I just don't get it.the "primary" scheme proposed in the draft is [EMAIL PROTECTED] where "KDDDSSSSS" is the "tag-value".
Cool. All that now needs to be determined is, if I start using these return addresses, why anyone else should care. What difference does it make, to someone else?
pgppciVzQB27V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
