Alessandro Vesely wrote: > For example, Lucio's server could have matched the bad MX 20 > of domain.com, unable to recognize its own IP address because it sits > behind a NAT, and unable to recognize its own name since the DNS hid > it. If it had used the good MX record by default, it would have > violated the SMTP prohibition to relay to a host at the same > preference level.
I don't quite get why (and it's crucial I understand it before I tell the other domain tech contact it's his fault). Could you please give me a pointer to relevant RFC about the SMTP prohibition you cited? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
