Jan Ingvoldstad writes:

RFC 1035:

<domain> ::= <subdomain> | " "

<subdomain> ::= <label> | <subdomain> "." <label>

<label> ::= <letter> [ [ <ldh-str> ] <let-dig> ]

<ldh-str> ::= <let-dig-hyp> | <let-dig-hyp> <ldh-str>

<let-dig-hyp> ::= <let-dig> | "-"

<let-dig> ::= <letter> | <digit> 

Indeed.

So any DNS reply that contains one of these fails to validate RFC 1035's grammar, and is ill-formed.

When a reply is ill-formed, no assurances can be made that some parts of it could be interpreted, or salvaged. Discarding the entire reply as a malformed, unprocessable reply, is not unreasonable.

Attachment: pgpW8ruWfoRk6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

Reply via email to