So far, since I got zdkimfilter to work properly I have recieved som dkim=pass (usually from gmail) and some dkim=fails.. All seems ok. By chance I compared the dkim=fail against what SpamAssassin said:
====== courier log Jul 26 21:45:47 e350 courierfilter: zdkimfilter[12888]:id=0000000000C804FC.0000000051F2D1E6.00003235: verified: dkim=fail (id=@dkim-reputation.org, body hash mismatch, stat=1) rep=0 Jul 26 21:45:47 e350 courierfilter: zdkimfilter[12888]:id=0000000000C804FC.0000000051F2D1E6.00003235: response: 250 Ok. Jul 26 21:45:47 e350 courierd: newmsg,id=0000000000C804FC.0000000051F2D1E6.00003235: dns; repsys.dkim-reputation.org (repsys.dkim-reputation.org [::ffff:46.4.178.182]) Jul 26 21:45:47 e350 courierd: started,id=0000000000C804FC.0000000051F2D1E6.00003235,from=<www-d...@dkim-reputation.org>,module=local,host=and...@lechevalier.se!!8!12!/var/mail/domains/lechevalier.se/anders!!,addr=<and...@lechevalier.se> Jul 26 21:45:47 e350 courierd: Waiting. shutdown time=none, wakeup time=none, queuedelivering=1, inprogress=1 Jul 26 21:45:47 e350 courierlocal: id=0000000000C804FC.0000000051F2D1E6.00003235,from=<www-d...@dkim-reputation.org>,addr=<and...@lechevalier.se>,size=14751,success: Message delivered. Jul 26 21:45:47 e350 courierd: completed,id=0000000000C804FC.0000000051F2D1E6.00003235 ====== ====== SpamAssassin log Jul 26 21:45:43 e350 spamd[19824]: spamd: processing message <5873b4b23ff3d57de56472c8c0240...@www.dkim-reputation.org> for mail:8 Jul 26 21:45:47 e350 spamd[19824]: spamd: clean message (1.8/5.0) for mail:8 in 3.8 seconds, 14419 bytes. Jul 26 21:45:47 e350 spamd[19824]: spamd: result: . 1 - BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16,HTML_MESSAGE scantime=3.8,size=14419,user=mail,uid=8,required_score=5.0,rhost=e350.lan.lechevalier.se,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=48478,mid=<5873b4b23ff3d57de56472c8c0240...@www.dkim-reputation.org>,bayes=0.499952,autolearn=no ====== What does body hash mismatch mean? Perhaps there are some headers not checked by SA but are checked with zdkimfilter? Spamassassin is run through pythonfilter-1.8. I believe pythonfilter might be run first as it is doing greyfiltering. Are the added headers from SpamAssassin the culprit? These are the headers from the email above ====== Delivered-To: and...@lechevalier.se Return-Path: <www-d...@dkim-reputation.org> Authentication-Results: e350; dkim=fail (body hash mismatch) header.i=@dkim-reputation.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on e350.lan.lechevalier.se X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from repsys.dkim-reputation.org (repsys.dkim-reputation.org [::ffff:46.4.178.182]) by e350 with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 21:45:42 +0200 id 0000000000C804FC.0000000051F2D1E6.00003235 Received-SPF: none (Address does not pass the Sender Policy Framework) SPF=MAILFROM; sender=www-d...@dkim-reputation.org; remoteip=::ffff:46.4.178.182; remotehost=repsys.dkim-reputation.org; helo=repsys.dkim-reputation.org; receiver=mail.tnonline.net; Received: from repsys.dkim-reputation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by repsys.dkim-reputation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C210398384 for <and...@lechevalier.se>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 21:38:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=dkim-reputation.org; h=to :subject:date:from:reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-type ; s=default; bh=Zbv3XTgeAhngG+jukxXJGBaEkcA=; b=eYMOEw2x9oUjhWgh MMBsrGuxNzz8MH8OAPpf7aRWvn0LtSBc93wXeSFqIe1LginJBp0VuGR9OaReUNH8 3D7ZRo/b03lPv9FWilixpc3vYEmlMIdSxUxbrY2uKrao/DsMoc3+xOlPppRRZPZa MnbvRRZodqNEmyLAaGu626ME9Hc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=dkim-reputation.org; h=to:subject :date:from:reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=I/0X89H+UeDCXaLgwxI33JhjCuIIJpgfPtuzWK0XZyTCybtFX6 A6SfGecLWCPZpm2XofNtD4wkWMdfK7X4H9NFKWkgem5lUdapGKWFmFsdazDh+TPM FoU77hgQr1eiljuaUq9C4WpuERorZxyn3jP7UG3DMATnZNxSgCBCY/LdM= Received: by repsys.dkim-reputation.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 5497B3983D1; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 21:38:30 +0200 (CEST) To: and...@lechevalier.se Subject: Proposal for DKIM-Reputation-Project [f688b566190ceed5d63f440b7dc3b38e67d68b04] Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 19:38:30 +0000 From: DKIM Reputation Project <i...@dkim-reputation.org> Reply-to: DKIM Reputation Project <submit-dom...@dkim-reputation.org> Message-ID: <5873b4b23ff3d57de56472c8c0240...@www.dkim-reputation.org> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="text/html"; boundary="b1_5873b4b23ff3d57de56472c8c0240f9e" Received-SPF: none (Address does not pass the Sender Policy Framework) SPF=FROM; sender=i...@dkim-reputation.org; remoteip=::ffff:46.4.178.182; remotehost=repsys.dkim-reputation.org; helo=repsys.dkim-reputation.org; receiver=mail.tnonline.net; --b1_5873b4b23ff3d57de56472c8c0240f9e Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b2_5873b4b23ff3d57de56472c8c0240f9e" --b2_5873b4b23ff3d57de56472c8c0240f9e Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ====== Thanks for any input. ~A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users