>> On 23.08.13 14:13, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >>>The spec was buggy on what type servers should look up, and querying >>>both --which is what Courier does-- is a waste of resources. Skipping >>>an unnecessary query seems to be rather an acknowledgment that type 99 >>>never flew, than a step backward.
>On Tue 03/Sep/2013 17:41:41 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> If it worked this way, We would not have MX records because the transition >> would not happen - because of the same reason. much better would be to >> better define how should resolver behave... On 03.09.13 20:41, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >Defining resolver behavior and having them comply are not the same >thing. If they were, we'd need no TXT record for SPF or DKIM, and >could use binary formats and edns0... sorry, those are two different things. >See also http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry ...maybe the new SPF should depend on this one. I still see no sane reason for removing SPF record from DNS. ... I wonder why your mails contain 2 pages of empty lines below your text and over the ads. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Enter any 12-digit prime number to continue. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
