Re: Contrib: Streams-based SRFI 134 implementation

[Arthur A. Gleckler]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 5:56 PM Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <w...@sigwinch.xyz>
wrote:


> Thanks.  Since the SRFI seems to require it, I’d add “This
> implementation’s basic ideque operations run in amortized O(1) time.”
>

Would you mind sending a pull request?  I'm uncertain about exactly what to
do with the existing implementation, e.g. should I remove it in favor of
this one?  I'm guessing that you want the above sentence added to the
Implementation section of the document, but having a pull request would
make that clearer.

Thanks.