Yes to both. On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 1:26 PM Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2022-09-18 11:06 +0200, Arthur A. Gleckler wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 5:56 PM Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks. Since the SRFI seems to require it, I’d add “This > > > implementation’s basic ideque operations run in amortized O(1) time.” > > > > > > > Would you mind sending a pull request? I'm uncertain about exactly what > to > > do with the existing implementation, e.g. should I remove it in favor of > > this one? I'm guessing that you want the above sentence added to the > > Implementation section of the document, but having a pull request would > > make that clearer. > > Absolutely. I hestitated to do so because I’m not sure how you and > John want to organize the repo. Should I add a directory for the new > implementation, and, if so, is it OK to call it srfi/, since this is > supposed to be the “default” sample implementation? > > -- > Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <[email protected]> >
