On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 9:15 AM Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <[email protected]> wrote:
> SRFI 189 talks of objects that satisfy 'error-object' in several > places. Of course, this should be 'error-object?'. I've fixed this > and opened a pull request. (CC-ing the list.) Thanks to you both. Merged and pushed, with erratum notice.
