Comments: 1. I propose the name with-continuation-handler, which is not present in SRFI 226.
2. In the first paragraph of the Rationale, read "supplemented" instead of "replaced". Call/cc will not be replaced. 3. The Examples section should be moved down to after the Specification section. 4. The syntax of `guard` should be properly indented. 5. Dynamic-wind will have to be redefined in an implementation that redefines call/cc. On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 6:44 PM Arthur A. Gleckler <[email protected]> wrote: > Scheme Request for Implementation 248, > "Minimal delimited continuations", > by Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen, > is now available for discussion. > > Its draft and an archive of the ongoing discussion are available at > https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-248/. > > You can join the discussion of the draft by filling out the subscription > form on that page. > > You can contribute a message to the discussion by sending it to > [email protected]. > > Here's the abstract: > > Scheme's exception system is extended so that exception handlers gain > access to the delimited continuation representing the rest of the > computation of the call of the thunk guarded by the handler. Algebraic > effect handlers can be directly expressed in this extended exception > system. The system directly implements the shift0/reset0 delimited > control operators. It is well known that other delimited control operators > like prompt0/control0 or reset/shift are expressible in shift0/reset0 > (and vice versa). > > Regards, > > SRFI Editor >
