On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 9:23 AM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Back to technical issues: In what sense do you think it matches the > experience at the REPL? At the REPL (leaving syntax definitions and > expansions aside, which are problematic to get right at the top level > anyway), a mutually recursive definition can be separated by as many > expressions as possible. This is the SRFI 245 semantics (and the semantics > of program and library bodies). > I took my editor's hat off only briefly, but only in support of the idea that having competing proposals is reasonable. It's important that, as editor, I bite my tongue. I am confident that a good outcome will come of the discussion.
