On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Jacob Sayles wrote: > That's a far cry from putting together a blanket coalition for all of > coworking. Danger! Danger Will Robinson!
I don't get the fear that this instills in some. It would be what we'd define it, not a "blanket coalition." Then by the assertion that it can't be defined is this definition by definition wrong? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coworking On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Susan Evans wrote: > Todd, I meant the exact opposite of protectionism - you CANNOT draw > hard lines around coworking which is what I think is so beautiful > about it. If it's too hard to define then most of the population will never understand it. I think that fear of defining it is an assurance that what we all individually know and love about coworking will be relegated to the fringes as others define its meaning to be something different for the majority of the population. Frankly, I'd like to see more people "get" it, not less. Anyway, it seems that I'm one of the few that would prefer a bit more definition so without the majority support I'll drop it and spend my energies elsewhere. -Mike Schinkel Ignition Alley Atlanta Coworking http://ignitionalley.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Coworking" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.
