> > Mike, > I would normally write this off line but think it important for the whole group for me to address your comment as I think some of the group may be feeling the same as you.
Based on your response statement below to the thread note: On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Susan Evans wrote: Todd, I meant the exact opposite of protectionism - you CANNOT draw hard lines around coworking which is what I think is so beautiful about it. If it's too hard to define then most of the population will never understand it. I think that fear of defining it is an assurance that what we all individually know and love about coworking will be relegated to the fringes as others define its meaning to be something different for the majority of the population. Frankly, I'd like to see more people "get" it, not less. Anyway, it seems that I'm one of the few that would prefer a bit more definition so without the majority support I'll drop it and spend my energies elsewhere. As a true optimist I think we can have both. Having spent some time there at > your site I have seen you achieve this delicate balance! It would be a shame > to loose your comments Mike. I will speak up again and say that I think > there are more of us out there who do share your thoughts .. perhaps some of > us who don't really get to respond have been watching ... real change agents > sometimes are known to do this... (in a good way like the folks from > Texas....hint hint,) so I would encourage everyone to just keep the thoughts > flowing. And, Mike I don't believe you are in the minority here.. Danielle > @WHEREMMM > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Coworking" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.
