We had the lowest level, cheapest UniFi APs. I think the UniFi Pro APs 
support more features, including 5 GHz + 2.4 GHz. Ultimately, the hardware 
controller in the Ruckus system is far more stable and more flexible than 
the software controller used by UniFi. Another issue I saw with UniFi - 
there's no good way to manage WiFi networks in multiple different buildings 
from a single computer/controller. The controller assumes that all APs you 
add are within the same building and network, so for my application of 
managing 2 - 3 buildings at once it doesn't work at all. I would have to 
install the controller software on a different computer per building, and I 
don't really want to carry around 3 laptops. You could probably do it with 
a different VM per building, but even that is a pain, having to launch a 
new VM for each building. For some of my clients, I've installed the UniFi 
software controller onto their on-site server, and then connect remotely 
through my laptop to make changes. This approach will of course only work 
if the building has a server already, or if you are willing to install a 
server just to run UniFi.

On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:09:52 AM UTC-8, Christian M. Macy wrote:
>
> Sonicwall allows bandwidth management, which is a good solution but is 
> harder to configure correctly. Also Unifi does actually support caps - not 
> sure if you had an older controller version?
>
> On Sunday, February 23, 2014 6:48:47 PM UTC-7, Tom Brandt - Workantile 
> wrote:
>>
>> Stephen,
>>
>> Could you give a little more detail about the microwave antenna solution? 
>> Who's your service provider? Did they provide the equipment?
>>
>> On Friday, February 21, 2014, Stephen Shumaker <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We were having the same issue at our more 'techy' building with lots of 
>>> heavy bandwidth users, here was our expensive but effective solution:
>>>
>>>
>>>    1. Upgrade bandwidth to as much as we could afford, which is 50/50 
>>>    mbps symmetrical. One-time cost of $5k (to install microwave antenna on 
>>>    roof), then $125/mo. We also have backup dual-line DSL for failover and 
>>>    VOIP. We have the option to upgrade to 100/100 in the future if needed. 
>>>    2. Upgrade Wifi Access Points to Ruckus Wireless. We originally had 
>>>    the Unifi APs, and they worked reliably and provided good coverage, 
>>> however 
>>>    they do not have any sort of load balancing or rate limiting features. 
>>>    Ruckus APs are a significant cost at $660 per AP and over $1000 for the 
>>>    hardware controller, but they have some incredible features, such as AP 
>>>    roaming, rate limiting, and what they call 'airtime fairness'. Airtime 
>>>    fairness works to dynamically shifting more RF energy to the devices 
>>> that 
>>>    need it the most (such as those streaming video or syncing to a cloud 
>>>    server). Most APs shoot RF in every direction, like a lightbulb, meaning 
>>>    that all devices get the same 'priority' in terms of the RF reaching 
>>> them. 
>>>    Ruckus APs 'point' their RF in a particular direction, like a lighthouse 
>>>    with a rotating spotlight. This means that light users browsing the web 
>>> or 
>>>    checking email won't be bogged down by heavy users streaming or syncing. 
>>>    Ruckus also supports rate limiting at the AP level, though we've found 
>>> that 
>>>    just the airtime fairness feature was enough to solve our bandwidth 
>>> issues, 
>>>    so fine-tuned rate limiting isn't needed. However, I did configure a 
>>> hard 
>>>    cap of 45/45 mbps via the Ruckus APs, so that no single device can ever 
>>> max 
>>>    out our bandwidth, leaving a 5/5 mbps buffer for all the hardwired 
>>> devices 
>>>    that bypass the APs. 
>>>
>>> At $10-15k this is not a cheap solution, but it has solved all of our 
>>> network/bandwidth-related problems practically overnight. For our third and 
>>> future buildings we will be rolling out this system from the beginning.
>>>  
>>> -- 
>>> Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Coworking" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> twb
>> @twbrandt
>> Sent from my Phone of i
>>
>

-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Coworking" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to