Ken Williams wrote:
On Mar 6, 2006, at 4:44 PM, Randy W. Sims wrote:
Adam Kennedy wrote:
It's part of the 1.2 spec:
<http://module-build.sourceforge.net/META-spec-v1.2.html#resources>
On the subject of spec changes, I was wondering what people thought
of changing the dynamic_config option to become static_config or
static_metadata.
It seems silly that the default is 1, and thus the only time you need
to provide information is when you say
dynamic_config(0);
What would be the reason for changing it? Just to avoid a
double-negative? That's probably not a good enough reason for me.
The positive default was the bug, the double negative was an annoyance
due to the double-negative, yes.
I'm not hugely worried if you don't reverse the name, now that the bug
is fixed.
