>>>>> On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:03:25 +1100, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> (Andreas J. Koenig) wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 22:33:18 -0600, Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>> said: >> > 19 Mar 4 20:12 META-spec-current.html -> META-spec-v1.2.html >> > We could also think about a v1.3, but really nothing of the >> *spec* >> > has changed since v1.2, just typo-fixing and more examples and some >> > reorg. >> Maybe repository could be added to resources? The only problem I see >> with repository is that one would like to know more than one thing >> about it: at least software and access URL, maybe more. >> Oh well, one should probably get away with the key >> "SubversionRepository". >> > Because everybody uses the same version control, right? :) Nonono, I was indirectly referring to the spec that says that words containing an uppercase letter are reserved for ad hoc usage, so 'SubversionRepository' is OK, as is 'CvsRepository', 'CVS-Repository', 'CVS', and, of course 'Perforce' and any combination with 'Repository', but not 'svk' alone for example. Just clarifying what my lazy fingers didn't want to type:) -- andreas
