"Alex Muntada" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [...] However, in this case, then all things being equal we're
> > just as likely to sprout 50+ FAIL reports in someone's mailbox
> > as in their RT queues. They'll be pissed off either way :-)
>
> Deleting a mail is easy, but dealing with RT tickets requires more
> effort and I'm sure there are authors that aren't using RT at all.
> Hence, filing new tickets in RT on the wild is a Bad Thing, IMHO.
That's my opinion, too.
> However, it there was some way to tag a distribution or author,
> so the FAILs associated with them are automatically sent to RT
> (as in the example you came across), that would be lovely.
> Maybe this should be done through META.yml. What do you think?
Maybe:
cpantesters:
fails_to_bugtracker: 1
author_wants_cc: always | never | reporter-specified
Sending to a bugtracker of course would only work if the user did not
specify a non-mail resources.bugtracker address.
Some authors expressed the wish to receive only fail reports for
specific perl versions, but I think this would somewhat complicate the
META.yml
Regards,
Slaven
--
Slaven Rezic - slaven <at> rezic <dot> de
BBBike - Routenplaner für Radfahrer in Berlin
WWW-Version: http://www.bbbike.de
Offline-Version für Unix,Mac,Windows: http://bbbike.sourceforge.net
