On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:28:43PM -0400, David Golden wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Barbie <bar...@missbarbell.co.uk> wrote: > > If it does, mine can be quickly patched to match it ;) > > > > Should an RC be classed as a patched version or an official release? I > > would think the former. > > It does look like Config::Perl::V can provide the list of local patches. > > What's the least pathological way to wedge RC status into the current reports? > > I'm loath to text munge the "Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version > 12 subversion 0) configuration:" line, but that might be the best > option.
I'd prefer it not to be there too, but not sure where to put it instead. Will have think later, unless someone comes up with a better idea first :) Cheers, Barbie. -- Birmingham Perl Mongers <http://birmingham.pm.org> Memoirs Of A Roadie <http://barbie.missbarbell.co.uk> CPAN Testers Blog <http://blog.cpantesters.org> YAPC Conference Surveys <http://yapc-surveys.org>
