On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 12:27:54PM -0500, Ricardo Signes wrote: > * David Oswald <daosw...@gmail.com> [2013-01-02T12:25:29] > > Of course all this is with respect to older production-track Perls, > > not older development-tracks. I agree that it's not useful for > > retired development track Perl's to be used in smoke testing modules. > > I am definitely interested in the results of older stable perls. Reports from > 5.8 are welcome indeed. > > I only want to see an end to old development releases: > > >>> Can we all agree that there's no reason at this date to be smoking with > >>> 5.13 or 5.15? > > So far, it seems we can.
I'll mention this in my next summary. Blocking the reports at www.cpantesters.org is a little too late, so adding appropriate distroprefs as Andreas suggested is the right way to do this. I'll also try and remember to ask peeps to add the old dev version to their distroprefs when the next stable release is out too. Cheers, Barbie. -- Birmingham Perl Mongers <http://birmingham.pm.org> Memoirs Of A Roadie <http://barbie.missbarbell.co.uk> CPAN Testers Blog <http://blog.cpantesters.org> YAPC Conference Surveys <http://yapc-surveys.org> Ark Appreciation Pages <http://ark.eology.org>
