On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 09:07:32AM -0800, MPR wrote: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Andreas Koenig > <andreas.koenig.7os6v...@franz.ak.mind.de> wrote: > > One might argue the ultimate goal of cpantesters is to find bugs. I'd > > say yes, but the bugs should be relevant. Bugs in very old and > > irrelevant combinations are *usually* noise that makes useful work > > harder for everybody involved. > You say "usually". Is there a case where it might be useful to test > and send reports against an old version?
Sure. Even if a module's author doesn't care, the module's users do. And cpXXXan cares deeply. -- David Cantrell | A machine for turning tea into grumpiness Aluminum makes a nice hat. All paranoids will tell you that. But what most do not know Is reflections will show On the CIA's evil landsat.
