Which Kwalitee test? Generally, as author of OSPrereqs and curator of the CPAN::Meta::Spec, my opinion is that any tool that draws conclusions about prerequisites in META.yml/json is doing it wrong unless the "dynamic_prereqs" field in META is *present* and *false*. (Note that OSPrereqs sets it true <https://metacpan.org/source/DAGOLDEN/Dist-Zilla-Plugin-OSPrereqs-0.007/lib/Dist/Zilla/Plugin/OSPrereqs.pm#L147> .)
That said, many tools (such as cpandeps) give pretty good results doing it wrong. But a Kwalitee test about prereqs in META should not flag a distribution that has dynamic dependencies. I would complain to the Kwalitee test author or else just ignore it. David On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Alceu R. de Freitas Jr. < cpan-testers-discuss@perl.org> wrote: > Hello to all, > > I have a distribution on CPAN (Siebel::Srvrmgr) that uses Dist::Zilla. > Some modules requirements are dependent of the OS where the distribution is > installed. I'm controlling that with the plug-in OSPrereqs. > > All seems to be working fine except it is generating an issue with > kwalitee test. A test from it is expecting to have all the prereqs > declared in the META.yml file, but OSPrereqs is not generating them there, > although the are (conditionally) considered in the Makefile.PL. > > I wonder if this is a bug of OSPrereqs Dist::Zilla plug-in, a problem in > the standard or the kwalitee test itself. > > If there is any documentation that you can point me to I would appreciate. > > Thanks, > > Alceu > > -- David Golden <x...@xdg.me> Twitter/IRC/Github: @xdg
