Thanks for the input. Fixed CPANTS analyzer (*) and started regenerating database.
* https://github.com/cpants/www-cpants/commit/2cfff74754f202915e506332529f8ec43226c2db Kenichi 2016-06-07 0:30 GMT+09:00 David Golden <x...@xdg.me>: > Which Kwalitee test? > > Generally, as author of OSPrereqs and curator of the CPAN::Meta::Spec, my > opinion is that any tool that draws conclusions about prerequisites in > META.yml/json is doing it wrong unless the "dynamic_prereqs" field in META > is *present* and *false*. (Note that OSPrereqs sets it true.) > > That said, many tools (such as cpandeps) give pretty good results doing it > wrong. But a Kwalitee test about prereqs in META should not flag a > distribution that has dynamic dependencies. I would complain to the > Kwalitee test author or else just ignore it. > > David > > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Alceu R. de Freitas Jr. > <cpan-testers-discuss@perl.org> wrote: >> >> Hello to all, >> >> I have a distribution on CPAN (Siebel::Srvrmgr) that uses Dist::Zilla. >> Some modules requirements are dependent of the OS where the distribution is >> installed. I'm controlling that with the plug-in OSPrereqs. >> >> All seems to be working fine except it is generating an issue with >> kwalitee test. A test from it is expecting to have all the prereqs declared >> in the META.yml file, but OSPrereqs is not generating them there, although >> the are (conditionally) considered in the Makefile.PL. >> >> I wonder if this is a bug of OSPrereqs Dist::Zilla plug-in, a problem in >> the standard or the kwalitee test itself. >> >> If there is any documentation that you can point me to I would appreciate. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Alceu >> > > > > -- > David Golden <x...@xdg.me> Twitter/IRC/Github: @xdg
