Yes. You can see this in the environment variables section:

    HARNESS_OPTIONS = j20

Is there already a consensus about enabling parallel smoking on all CPAN
distributions? Is it possible to blacklist/whitelist distributions for
parallel testing?

Regards,
    Slaven


Ben Aveling <bena....@optusnet.com.au> writes:

> Possibly a stupid question, but are any tests being run in parallel here?
>
> Regards,  Ben
>
> On 10/07/16 20:50, David Golden wrote:
>> Hi, Nigel.
>>
>> Here's another odd failure:
>>
>> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/cd9352da-4607-11e6-9fc5-14bfbd15da07
>>
>> Output from '/usr/bin/make test':
>>
>> PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1
>> "/home/njh/perl5/perlbrew/perls/perl-5.18.0/bin/perl"
>> "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-MTest::Harness" "-e" "undef
>> *Test::Harness::Switches; test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')"
>> t/*.t
>> Could not execute
>> (/home/njh/perl5/perlbrew/perls/perl-5.18.0/bin/perl t/recurse.t):
>> open3: exec of /home/njh/perl5/perlbrew/perls/perl-5.18.0/bin/perl
>> t/recurse.t failed at
>> /home/njh/perl5/perlbrew/perls/perl-5.18.0/lib/site_perl/5.18.0/TAP/Parser/Iterator/Process.pm
>> line 165.
>> Makefile:899: recipe for target 'test_dynamic' failed
>> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 7
>>
>> Could you please see if this is repeatable?  I can't think of any
>> reason why this would be happening only for some tests.
>>
>> If this is widespread/common/random, I wonder if CPAN::Reporter et
>> al. need to try to detect this error and not send a report.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> David Golden <x...@xdg.me <mailto:x...@xdg.me>> Twitter/IRC/GitHub: @xdg
>

-- 
Slaven Rezic - slaven <at> rezic <dot> de
  BBBike - route planner for cyclists in Berlin
  WWW version:                           http://www.bbbike.de
  Perl/Tk version for Unix and Windows:  http://bbbike.sourceforge.net

Reply via email to