Hi, On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:47 AM, David Precious <david.preci...@uk2.net> wrote: > On Thursday 16 June 2011 11:20:08 Henk P. Penning wrote: >> at best, 'iim' could be an alternative for 'rrr-client' ; >> it is just another rrr client ; it is not a replacement >> for anything. >> >> If/when 'iim' is tested a little more (and everybody likes it :-), >> then 'iim' could be mentioned on the 'instant mirroring' page >> as an alternative for 'rrr-client'. >> >> For now, I would just really appreciate some feedback on 'iim'. > > Fair enough - I'm already testing rrr-client (and finding it to work well), so > when I have sufficient tuits of circular shape, I'll try out iim alongside and > offer any feedback I can.
I can also start a iim run in parallel with rrr. > Incidentally, I've not seen any reports on the progress of instant mirroring > for a bit - have I mised anything? I (and ambs) have cpan.perl.pt using rrr for some time now, and this past weekend the promoted it to be the master mirror. So far (using find . -type f, and diff) the differences are those to be expected. I plan to double check with rsync -nav during the weekend and if no problems are found, drop the rsync-based mirror. backpan.perl.pt will keep a 6 hour lag over cpan.perl.pt. Bye, -- Pedro Melo @pedromelo http://www.simplicidade.org/ http://about.me/melo xmpp:m...@simplicidade.org mailto:m...@simplicidade.org
