* David Golden <x...@xdg.me> [2015-05-01 11:25]: > To the last point, in hindsight, I wish we'd had that discussion first > at the hackathon as I think it might have influenced the others. Mea > culpa. Or possibly, we wouldn't have gotten there without the early > warm discussions as warm-ups.
Those were exactly my own thoughts; as written in my retrospective, in fact. And no, I don’t think we could have gotten there on direct route. Basically, while I completely understand your imperative for putting the T::B discussion up front, it was premature to get technical without having first established principles under which the technical decisions ought to be taken… for which I believe it was necessary to go through the conversations that took place on the days leading up to the river of CPAN discussion. > No way to know and we can't do it over Unfortunately. > so we'll just have to muddle forward. Do we just accept that stuff might go flowing downriver? Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
