* David Golden <x...@xdg.me> [2016-02-16T00:04:05] > I'll try to restate the problems in my own words: > > (1) Last uploader as "point of contact" > > How often is this really a problem?
For me, I'd say it averages a few times a month. I'm slowly getting this down by slogging at the problem, getting permissions transferred away from me, but it's a pain in the rear. > Thus, compared to Rik's original proposal, I suggest that emphasizing the > full, current 06perms team (denoting who is primary/secondary and with some > sort of "CPAN activity" indicator), is more beneficial than just > emphasizing the primary maintainer over last uploader. I think that's good/fine/okay-at-least, too. My reason for balking at it is *only* that metacpan pages are also swimming in information. I'd still make the primary person's name the easiest one to want to click to send email to. :-) (I know people *should* be using the bug tracker, but I also know that they often *don't.) > Summary: > [...] Cool. -- rjbs
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
