* Olivier Mengué <olivier.men...@gmail.com> [2016-02-18T05:46:44] > > When it is a problem -- when the last uploader doesn't want to be the > > point of contact -- under what circumstances is having someone else be > > better? > > > > * if primary maintainer is active, they can re-release to be the "last > > uploader" > > * if primary maintainer is not active, how is listing them any better for > > the community than the last person? It's still a dead end. > > If the primary maintainer is not active but is bothered for being contacted > about this old module he abandonned to his co-maints, he could just give up > his first-come permission to one of those co-maint.
Exactly. -- rjbs
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
