I have an `EventManager` class written in C++ and exposed to Python. This is how I intended for it to be used from the Python side:
class Something: def __init__(self): EventManager.addEventHandler(FooEvent, self.onFooEvent) def __del__(self): EventManager.removeEventHandler(FooEvent, self.onFooEvent) def onFooEvent(self, event): pass (The `add-` and `remove-` are exposed as static functions of `EventManager`.) The problem with the above code is that the callbacks are captured inside `boost::python::object` instances; when I do `self.onFooEvent` these will increase the reference count of `self`, which will prevent it from being deleted, so the destructor never gets called, so the event handlers never get removed (except at the end of the application). The code works well for functions that don't have a `self` argument (i.e. free or static functions). How should I capture Python function objects such that I won't increase their reference count? I only need a weak reference to the objects. -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Python-Callbacks-to-class-functions-tp3709880p3709880.html Sent from the Python - c++-sig mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig