Hi Dean, On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:10, Dean Michael Berris<[email protected]> wrote: > > Kim's attempt was more of an OO approach (please correct me if I'm > wrong Kim), something that I felt was too "simple" and could also be > done with just static polymorphism.
Yes, that's a fair assessment. > My approach is almost different from any approach that I've seen taken > as far as URL parsing is concerned -- using template functions and > template classes and a generic programming approach to specific URL > parsing. However mine is not as close to the RFC as I'd like, and is > not as well tested as I'd like either. > > Can us three gentlemen work together towards: 1) Adding better test > coverage 2) Implementing the details of the RFC and 3) Merging what we > can towards something that works and is release-ready? I'd love to help with the tests, but we've just had our second child and life with two kids doesn't leave much time for hacking :-) Let me see if I can help out, but don't count on it. Quick question -- parse_specific seems to be a function template that you specialize on the Range and Tag. I thought specializing function templates was frowned upon, e.g. [1]...? Plus, as I understand it, you can't partially specialize it (reuse code parsers for one Range over several Tags). Can't you use simple overloading to get the same result? I can't claim to understand it in detail, I just browsed the code quickly, but this jumped out at me. Thanks, - Kim [1] http://www.gotw.ca/publications/mill17.htm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Cpp-netlib-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpp-netlib-devel
