Hi Dean, On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 12:24, Dean Michael Berris<[email protected]> wrote: > > Makes sense... However, my only concern here is that the simplicity of > using the free function parse_specific and relying on ADL to pick up > the correct implementation.
Ah, I see -- the ADL overload aspect didn't occur to me. > Although I guess it should be easy to make 'parse' a public static > function so we don't have to instantiate the scheme_specific_parser<>. Oops, yeah, that's what I meant -- I missed the 'static'. But does that sort out the ADL-based implementation selection? We probably need a wrapper function that delegates to the scheme_specific_parser, no? > I like it! :D When do I expect a patch and passing tests? :D Maybe when I have more than 6 continuous minutes/day of time to myself ;-) - Kim ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Cpp-netlib-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpp-netlib-devel
