I think it is good for readability. It's the first time that I see it ... :)
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Dean Michael Berris <[email protected]
> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Fernando Pelliccioni
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Perfect Duean, Great news!!!
> >
> > Only a question:
> >
> > Why not do
> >
> > if ( ! boost::iequals(parts.scheme.substr(0, 5), "https") )
> >
> > instead of
> >
> > if ( not boost::iequals(parts.scheme.substr(0, 5), "https") )
> >
> > ?
> >
>
> Good question... I have no good answer except that the version with
> the "not" reads better.
>
> It's a matter of taste -- I just might remove the 'not', 'and', and
> 'or' keywords if I get tired of fighting it. ;)
>
> --
> Dean Michael Berris
> deanberris.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
> _______________________________________________
> Cpp-netlib-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpp-netlib-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Cpp-netlib-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpp-netlib-devel
