On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Matt Trentini <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Why not do >>> if ( ! boost::iequals(parts.scheme.substr(0, 5), "https") ) >>> instead of >>> if ( not boost::iequals(parts.scheme.substr(0, 5), "https") ) >> >> I prefer the second way- it's more expressive and it's standards-compliant. >> This is a bug in the Microsoft compiler. > > Dean's right, it's a matter of taste; I prefer it the first way. :) > > IMO, it's no less expressive and that use is far more common - and > better understood - in the C++ domain. >
Yeah, but I like English more personally. Again, it's really easy to fix and I just might do that if there's overwhelming opinion in support for the symbolic version versus the (standards-compliant) English-ish version. -- Dean Michael Berris deanberris.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Cpp-netlib-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpp-netlib-devel
