On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Dean Michael Berris
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> So today I revisited my implementation of the directives and it looks
> like using Boost.Variant in the implementation seems to be one of the
> biggest contributors to compile time -- well, second to Boost.Spirit
> -- and removing it from the directive implementations seems to be
> going well.
>
> I'll be pushing soon so expect a greatly reduced compile-time for the tests 
> now.
>

Well, I jumped the gun on "greatly reduced". It's a little faster than
usual. I keep forgetting that clang is just really way faster than
GCC. But, it's niticeably quicker on GCC 4.5. Not sure with other
compilers though. :D

HTH!

-- 
Dean Michael Berris
deanberris.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Cpp-netlib-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cpp-netlib-devel

Reply via email to