Joshua Kramer wrote: > >> I'm not sure a lot of people would go with PGStorage (we don't, >> actually, but your feedback on this is very welcome). Other than that, >> such a document would be, I think, very useful for a lot of people. > > When I have more of a system put together, I'll have to do some > benchmarks regarding I/O and CPU utilization for both PGStorage and > ZODB; my intent was to be able to increase throughput by splitting > duties between two servers, instead of having Zope act as both a HTTP > and a DB server.
If this is what you want to achieve, according to old (> 2 years old) benchmarks of ours, you would get more performance, and easier installation from using simply ZEO. > Also, I think that APE would probably be more suited to this task, as > it can map fields in the ZODB object <-> Postgres, but I had problems > getting Ape to work with Zope 2.9.2, so for the time being I'm using > PGStorage. I also tried APE about 2 years ago. It didn't work well with CPS at the time, but feedback on this topic is also welcome. S. -- Stéfane Fermigier, Tel: +33 (0)6 63 04 12 77 (mobile). Nuxeo Collaborative Portal Server: http://www.nuxeo.com/cps Gestion de contenu web / portail collaboratif / groupware / open source! _______________________________________________ cps-devel mailing list http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-devel
